I wasn't going to succumb to this meme but in the light of the fact that I have enjoyed reading the confessions of so many others, I felt duty bound to add my own contribution, not least as a way of getting out of a lack-of-blogging rut.
1. I confess that, despite David Bentley Hart, I still love listening to Wagner (Bach as well mind you).
2. I confess that some times I wonder whether I should really be a Roman Catholic, but that in the end I am not sure I could be anything other than a Baptist (despite some fundamental differences with much of what passes for standard Baptist opinion on matters liturgical, doctrinal or ethical).
3. I confess that although I love Manchester and could live here my whole life, there is a place in my heart that is always Oxford.
4. I confess that every attempt I have ever made to introduce some basic spiritual discipline in my life has failed ... miserably.
5. I confess that it annoys me when comments in favour of contextual approaches to theology are accompanied by comments disparaging the historical western theological tradition and used as a way of avoiding the necessary in depth engagement with it. The point is that the whole lot, from Paul, through Augustine, Aquinas, Calvin and Barth is contextual theology.
6. I confess that I still think that Greek should be mandatory for anyone studying for the ordained ministry of word and sacrament.
7. I confess that I can be really rather lazy and that I do not write as much as I should.
8. I confess that I fear that I am more of a politician than a prophet - and this bothers me.
9. I confess that I often think that being a Baptist minister is the thing that has kept me Christian and that becoming a NT scholar and teacher is the thing that has kept me in ministry.
I love your number 3, Sean. Me too (re Oxford, I mean).
Posted by: Mark Goodacre | Sunday, July 08, 2007 at 02:15 AM
Hi Graham
I take your point although even martyrdom has been 'welcomed' by some.
Posted by: Sean Winter | Wednesday, July 04, 2007 at 04:31 AM
'I always get the impression they were glad of the helping hand and were much happier to jump that Luther or the early English Separatists were.'
Bearing in mind that the helping hand was often martyrdom, I'm not sure that 'glad' is the right word to use! However, I can see what you're saying now, so thanks.
Posted by: graham | Wednesday, July 04, 2007 at 03:39 AM
Hi Graham
In the end it seems to me that, either through explicit disciplinary measures, or through intense persecution and enforced exile, the 'established church' (whether it be European Catholicism of the 16th Century or the Church of England in the early 17th Century) effectively expelled those whose agenda was, albeit expressed in ideal terms, the reform of those churches. In many sense I think they were pushed. Separation lies at the heart of the early Anabaptist agenda, however. They were pushed as well, but I always get the impression they were glad of the helping hand and were much happier to jump that Luther or the early English Separatists were.
Posted by: Sean Winter | Tuesday, July 03, 2007 at 11:20 PM
Sean, can you elaborate on your statement on 'one of the reasons why I am a Baptist rather than an Anabaptist'.
It seems to me that the suggestion that the Reformers were not schismatic is simply romantic, so I must be missing something.
Posted by: graham | Tuesday, July 03, 2007 at 11:12 PM
Fernando: it would take too long to develop what is a fairly broad swipe at many fellow Baptists. I guess that overall my point is that I would like to see much more explicit reflection on the nature and shape of Christian worship so that the reflection actually begins to transform the weekly practice in many of our churches. The challenge is to find ways of doing this that are authentically Baptist.
Ingrid: I agree. Steve Harmon in his book on Baptist Catholicism concludes by asking the question 'Why am I not a Catholic?' - his answer begins with profound issues about the role of women in the Catholic church. However (and this should not be understood as a definitive answer to the contrary) in the end the theological question looms large for me: when is the need for reform sufficiently crucial to necessitate ecclesial schism? The best answer to this is that the reformers did not seek schism, but that, through the disciplinary actions of the church, were made to be schismatic. This is one of the reasons why I am a Baptist rather than an Anabaptist (complex historical argument I know).
Posted by: Sean Winter | Tuesday, July 03, 2007 at 12:24 AM
I was at Regents' in '93. I've been searching for a way/excuse/money to get back ever since.
Posted by: Michael Westmoreland-White | Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 10:36 AM
I'm in sympathy with the Catholic thing (liturgy especially) but you could only really do it if you can answer yes to these questions...
1. Is mothering the most fulfilling thing a woman can do?
2. If a woman isn't an amazing, motherly, angelic, pure person is she a temptress/seductress/whore?
(Yes I know I'm sterotyping but I didn't start it!)
Posted by: Ingrid | Friday, June 29, 2007 at 09:32 PM
Hi Sean, could you please say a bit more on #2? Liturgy and other matters need some reflection and not just being led by the tide, as it were, I think
Posted by: Fernando Mendez | Friday, June 29, 2007 at 08:03 PM
Hi Michael
I agree, see my response to Catriona. What year were you at Regent's?
Posted by: Sean Winter | Friday, June 29, 2007 at 07:42 AM